The authors observed 40 residents and 30 internists in the internal medicine department in an academic medical center in The Netherlands while they searched PubMed and UpToDate.

A complete answer was found in 53% questions sent to PubMed or UpToDate. A partial or full answer was obtained in 83% of UpToDate searches and 63% of PubMed searches (p less than 0.001).

UpToDate answered more questions than PubMed on all major medical topics, but a significant difference was detected only when the question was related to etiology or therapy.

Time to answer was 241 seconds for UpToDate and 291 seconds for PubMed.

It looks like UpToDate is gradually becoming “the universal textbook of medicine.” Do you remember the last time you opened Harrison’s to consult about a clinical topic? Was that in 1997 or 2001?

There is an old proverb: beware the man

of a single book (homo unius libri). It describes people with limited knowledge.

I find UpToDate useful and read it all the time. However, there are billions of scientific journal pages on the Web and the answer to your question must be somewhere out there. Do not be a man of only one book.

References:
Answers to questions posed during daily patient care are more likely to be answered by UpToDate than PubMed. Hoogendam A, Stalenhoef AF, Robbé PF, Overbeke AJ. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(4):e29.
Link via Ivor Kovic.
Are You Dependent on UpToDate for Your Clinical Practice?
5 Tips to Stay Up-to-Date with Medical Literature
Image source: UpToDate.

Original post by noreply@blogger.com (Ves Dimov, M.D.)

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists